Outcome one: Legislative and policy frameworks, based on evidence and in line with international human rights standards, on all forms of violence against women and girls and harmful practices are in place and translated into plans
Assumptions: Political will and commitments at the highest levels demonstrated through VAW/HP legislative and policy frameworks that align to international human rights standards and harmonization of all other laws and policies to be gender equitable including family law; linkages across policies on migration, disability, poverty, ethnicity, age, location, education, overall violence and conflict
Signature Indicator: Proportion of CEDAW, CRC, UPR recommendations regarding laws and policies on VAWG/HP, that have been fully implemented in line with HR standards
Outcome two: National and sub-national systems and institutions plan, fund and deliver evidence-based programmes that prevent and respond to violence against women and girls and harmful practices, including in other sectors
Assumptions: Governance, institutional and critical bottlenecks addressed to allow transformation of institutions; develop and full financed national action plan on VAP/HP; institutions are gender responsive/human rights based; VAW/HP is integrated into other sectors; linkages across institutions on migration, disability, poverty, ethnicity, age, location, education, overall violence and conflict
Signature Indicator: Percentage of national budget being allocated to the prevention and elimination of all forms of VAWG/HP
Outcome three: Gender inequitable social norms, attitudes and behaviours change at community and individual levels to prevent violence against women and girls and harmful practices
Assumptions: Political will and commitments at the highest levels demonstrated through investment in national programmes and interventions aimed at addressing root causes and gender transformative results across relevant sectors; An integrated/multi-pronged approach to prevention is effective to change social norms and attitudes which results in changes in behaviors
Signature Indicator: Percentage of people who think it is never justifiable for a man to beat his wife (by sex and age); Percentage of people (men, women, boys, girls) aged 15 to 49 years who have heard about FGM and think the practice should end (DHS); Percentage of men and women who think child marriage is acceptable (MICS)
Outcome four: Women and girls who experience violence and harmful practices use available, accessible, acceptable, and quality essential services including for long term recovery from violence
Assumptions: Political will and commitment at the highest levels demonstrated through investment of national funds towards multisectoral services at the national level; Quality services will increase women’s confidence in seeking support and increasing their access to such services, including SRH services, commitment and resources to collect data and coordinate services; there is political will to address impunity and prosecute perpetrators; integrate VAWG into education and training .
Signature Indicator: Percentage of victims/survivors of violence (including trafficking) that have received efficient, effective and gender responsive services from relevant institutions including to address their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR).
Outcome five: Quality, disaggregated and globally comparable data on different forms of violence against women and girls and harmful practices, collected, analysed and used in line with international standards to inform laws, policies and programmes
Assumptions: Political will and commitment at the highest levels demonstrated through investment of national statistical systems to improve data production, analysis and use, including data on gender related-targets; there is political will and commitment to invest in the collection of data on VAWG/HP; freedom of information is respected and governments are increasingly open to sharing data on VAWG/HP with all stakeholders; VAWG/HP data will be used to inform policy making and budgeting.
Signature Indicator: Existence of globally comparable data from VAWG prevalence surveys.
Outcome six: Women's rights groups, autonomous social movements and civil society organisations, including those representing youth and groups facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination/marginalization, more effectively influence and advance progress on GEWE and ending VAWG
Assumptions: Norms and frameworks aligned to international standards as the necessary enabling environment for women's organization and civil society organizations involvement in policy making and delivery of programmes on VAWG/HP; autonomy, agency and role of women’s rights organizations and civil society recognized by government and partners; women's organizations represent the diversity of women and girls, survivors of violence and all groups facing intersecting forms of violence and discrimination
Signature Indicator: Proportion of women's rights organizations, autonomous social movements and civil society organizations, including those representing youth and groups facing intersecting forms of discrimination/marginalization, report having greater influence and agency to work on EVAWG
Resource: