- One benefit of the framework is to assist those working in humanitarian settings to consider how to introduce programming strategically—so that efforts are not reactive, based on emergency needs (as is often the case in humanitarian settings), but proactive, based on an overarching goal of developing a comprehensive approach to addressing VAWG.
- It is useful to consider how to prioritize the implementation of the strategic framework. In an acute emergency, the primary focus may be on operational response/ services, because the infrastructure may not exist to support systemic or structural reform. However, as situations stabilize, efforts must be expanded in order to build the capacity of systems—across all the primary sectors—to monitor VAWG and respond when an incident occurs. When governments are reinstated and there is a functioning judiciary, it is important to initiate the process of structural reform, to ensure that there is comprehensive legislation that is effectively implemented to protect women and girls from VAWG, and to punish perpetrators when an incident occurs. Policies (designed by relevant ministries) are also an important part of structural reform, because they reinforce systemic reform across all sectors (i.e. health policy that included medical management of rape as a part of all hospital services).
- The following suggests a general outline for interventions according to phases of humanitarian response. However, it is critical to recognize that every setting will be different, and the process of scaling up interventions may not fit neatly into the categories outline below. Interventions must be adapted according to local needs.
-
- Acute Emergency: Focus on Delivery of Services
- Direct health and psychosocial services to survivors
- Community awareness-raising about services
- Interagency coordination group
- Basic SOPs
- Stable Phase: Add Systemic Reform
- Agency protocols and systems development
- Data collection and monitoring
- Legal Assistance and Court Processes
- Post Conflict: Add Structural Reform
- Policy development for key sectors
- Government-led coordination
- Legislative reform
- Acute Emergency: Focus on Delivery of Services
Example: The implementation of the project funded by CIDA in South Kivu is an illustrative example: Indeed, early in the project (which lasted four years), we focused on the provision / supply of services, including pre-positioning of PEP kits, training providers, management of medical services, and the implementation of psychosocial counseling centers. Gradually, as the situation improved, we have carried out actions in two areas: coordination and legal and judicial support. The coordination has increasingly been asserted by setting up land commissions that fight against sexual violence, and within these frameworks, in which medical providers, police, local NGOs, and traditional leaders were present, we were able to discuss approaches, gaps to be filled, etc. The legal empowerment has taken lots of time because we had to wait until the government could strengthen the judicial system, which also takes time. Currently, the project is underway to receive an extension, and we intend to strengthen government leadership and address the harmonization of the various empowerment protocols.
Example: In Zimbabwe there was the ‘Operation Clean Up’ which started off as an emergency and transitioned to protracted relief. During the emergency period, community awareness on GBV was conducted using drama and IEC materials. The health system was supported with PEP kits and related drugs. Psycho-social support was also offered to survivors. In the protracted relief stage, survivors and the entire community were assisted with permanent shelter and livelihoods activities. During the distribution of food and non-food items, shelter, livelihoods and health related projects awareness sessions were held. Another entry point used was during the reception of deported migrants at the border posts. Information on GBV and response services were offered in a multi sectoral way. During the ‘Operation Clean Up’ all affected people were relocated and assisted equally. Cases of GBV were handled in a confidential manner by training cadres at community level who assisted in referring cases the appropriated service providers.
- The checklist below, developed as tool for VAWG actors working in Northern Uganda, summarizes many of the key objectives of comprehensive response programming. A checklist such as this can be used to help local partners envisage the broad goals of multi-sectoral programming.
Standards for Good Quality Response activities |
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
TRAINING FOR ALL ACTORS
THE COMMUNITY
HEALTH RESPONSE
PSYCHOSOCIAL RESPONSE
LEGAL AND JUSTICE RESPONSE
SECURITY & SAFETY RESPONSE
If survivor chooses to report the incident to the police:
CO-ORDINATION, REFERRALS, REPORTING, MONITORING & EVALUATION
|