There are several types of coordinated community response to violence against women:
(See: UN Women, Domestic Violence: Legislation and its Implementation, (2009))
Example: Safety Audits to Track Systems Response
Safety Auditing is a tool developed by US-based Praxis International in the domestic violence context to help determine whether women’s safety is actually being promoted by the policies and procedures designed for that purpose. A safety audit is conducted by a multidisciplinary team drawn from the institutions/systems being audited that examines whether work routines and ways of doing business strengthen or impede safety for victims. The audit team reviews all aspects of an interagency response to violence and looks for gaps that may create safety risks for victims. The Audit is focused on understanding how 1) a victim becomes a legal ‘case’; 2) responses to that case are organized and coordinated within and across intervening agencies; and 3) complexity of risk and safety varies for each individual victim. The audit team conducts interviews, observational research, and reviews the paper trail created as systems respond to victims. Analysis then focuses on how risks for women result from the systems that are in place and how those risks can be eliminated. This process provides critical feedback into the community response to cases of violence against women. The Logistics Guide provides extensive information about the Audit method and its process of gathering and analyzing data. The Guide’s templates, illustrations and worksheets outline the Safety Audit’s philosophical underpinnings, clarify the data collection steps and methodologies, and provide a knowledge base for the team’s work.
In a pilot project for a domestic violence community response program in Queensland, Australia, partners included the Brisbane City Council, Department of Families, Department of Justice and Attorney General, Department of Corrective Services, Police Service, Office of Women’s Policy, Family Court of Australia, Domestic Violence Resource Centre, Combined Women’s Refuge Group, Women’s Legal Service, Lord Mayors Women’s Liaison Group, and the Immigrant Women’s Support Service. See: Coordinated Community Response to Domestic Violence (CCR) Wynnum Pilot Project.
In Eritrea, a national coordinating task force on ending female genital mutilation was led by the Ministry of Health and included representatives from the Ministry of Education (MOE), Ministry of Labour and Human Welfare (MLHW), Ministry of Justice (MOJ), Ministry of Information (MOI), National Union of Eritrean Women, National Union of Eritrean Youth and Students, and local heads of government social service. See: NORAD, Review of FGM/C Projects in Eritrea (2007).
CASE STUDY – Andhra Pradesh, India
In India, the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act requires each state to institute a protection officer system to assist victims of domestic violence. Implementation of this provision has been particularly effective in the state of Andhra Pradesh, based on a strong inter-agency coordination programme. The police, legal aid groups, protection officers, and other civil society service providers have developed clear guidelines and agreements for interagency coordination. When a case of domestic violence is reported to the police, the woman generally is referred to a protection officer who then gives appropriate referrals to service agencies. Legal aid lawyers provide free legal services for victims who need that assistance. A related factor in the success of the Andhra Pradesh system is that the state government allocates more funds than any other Indian state to implementation of the domestic violence law. See: Domestic Violence: Legislation and its Implementation, 44-45, UN Women (2009).
Previous Topic Benefits of coordinated community response